NRLN TVA Retirees Chapter

Published: Updated: 706 views
A+A-
Reset

TVA Survey Narrative

To: TVA Retirees Chapter Members
From: Dan Pitts
Subject: Important Update: NRLN’s Ongoing Efforts to Address Injustice to TVA Retirees

Dear TVA Retirees,

I wanted to take a moment to update you on the important ongoing work the National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN) is doing to address the injustices faced by TVA retirees regarding the termination of our company-sponsored Medicare supplemental coverage.

As detailed in NRLN President Bill Kadereit’s November 22 update, the NRLN is continuing its efforts to rectify the issues that began in January 2017 when TVA unilaterally ended retirees’ company-sponsored Medicare coverage and redirected us to enroll in new plans through a private Medicare exchange (PME) known as OneExchange (now Via Benefits). Around 14,000 TVA retirees ultimately purchased their new plans through Via Benefits in 2017.

We first began receiving complaints from retirees in August 2017 about the treatment they received during the transition. Many retirees felt pressured into making quick decisions and were told that they “must” enroll through Via Benefits to avoid a “lapse” in coverage, which could last for a year. Others reported that the rates for Via Benefits’ Medigap plans were much higher than those available in the open market.

Medicare law includes Guaranteed Issue Rights (GIR), which protect retirees when an employer ends a Medigap plan. Unfortunately, we found that TVA’s communications with retirees were often misleading, and in some cases, incorrect. Moreover, the Medigap rates offered through Via Benefits were often significantly higher than those available elsewhere.

In addition, as we’ve investigated further, we’ve found similar complaints from retirees across the country whose employers also ended their Medigap plans. Many of these retirees were not provided proper notice of their GIRs, which is required by law. If retirees did not receive adequate notice, they may be eligible for a Special Enrollment Period (SEP), which would allow them to purchase new Medigap plans without restrictions due to pre-existing conditions.

Bill Kadereit recently shared with me a near-final draft of a white paper that will be used in Washington, D.C. in the coming months to advocate for TVA retirees who were affected by these violations. (Please find the Executive Summary of the white paper attached.) The NRLN intends to push for restitution for the affected 14,000 TVA retirees, seeking compensation for the difference between the premiums they paid and the lower premiums they could have paid had their rights been properly honored.

The white paper also documents similar violations involving AT&T, Avaya, and IBM retirees, whose employers also failed to provide proper GIR notifications, violating federal law and National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) guidelines.

As we move forward, NRLN’s Executive Director will be meeting with key Congressional staff and officials from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) after the 119th Congress opens on January 3. The goal is to present the white paper and urge action to remedy these violations. In addition, letters will be sent to federal officials responsible for enforcing these laws.

Please be aware that these efforts will take time. I will continue to work closely with Bill and keep you updated on our progress.

Thank you for your continued support as we work together to seek justice for TVA retirees.

Sincerely,

Daniel M. Pitts

865-242-4139

danpitts99@gmail.com

To: TVA Retirees Chapter Members:
From: Dan Pitts
Subject: Important Update: NRLN Continues to Work to Rectify Injustice to TVA Retirees

NRLN President Bill Kadereit’s November 22 email Update on NRLN Study and Plans to Protect Your Medicare Guaranteed Issue Right (GIR) details NRLN’s continued work on rectifying injustices to TVA retirees beginning January 2017.

After the opening of the new 119th Congress on January 3, the NRLN’s Executive Director will hold meetings with staff members of Congressional Leaders and officials of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to present the white paper and urge action to remedy the errors made by retirees’ former employers. In addition, letters will be mailed to federal officials who are responsible for enforcing federal laws.

The NRLN’s efforts in Washington, D.C. will take some time. I will keep in touch with Bill and update TVA Retirees Chapter members as the process progresses.

As many know, TVA unilaterally terminated its retirees’ company-sponsored Medicare supplemental coverage (Medigap) and directed its retirees to enroll in new plans through a private Medicare exchange (PME) known as OneExchange (now known as Via Benefits) beginning January 2017.  Around 14,000 TVA retirees ultimately purchased their new plans through Via Benefits during 2017. 

In August of 2017, we began receiving complaints from TVA retirees about how they were treated during termination of the TVA-sponsored Medicare plan and transition to the VIA Benefits PME. Retirees complained they were coerced to quickly purchase new plans through Via Benefits and that TVA instructed them they “must” enroll through Via Benefits or face a “lapse” in coverage that could last a year. In addition, there were many complaints that Via Benefits’ Medigap plan rates were significantly higher than other plans available to retirees in the open market.

Medicare law establishes specific rights which protect retirees when an employer terminates a Medigap plan – those rights are known as guaranteed issue rights (GIR).  In reviewing retirees’ GIR, we realized that some of the information TVA gave its retirees about their options to purchase new Medigap plans was misleading and, in some cases, simply false. In addition, we confirmed that, in many cases, Via Benefits’ Medigap plan rates were significantly higher than plans available in the open market.

Since then, NRLN has documented complaints from other retirees across the nation about employers’ terminating their company-sponsored Medigap plans.  In those cases, it appears that retirees were not given full and accurate notice of their GIR.  According to law, those who did not receive proper notice about their GIR may be eligible for a Special Enrollment Period (SEP).  A SEP would give them the right to purchase new Medigap plans in the open market without restriction due to any pre-existing medical conditions.

Last week Bill shared with me a white paper nearing its final draft that will be used in Washington, D.C. in the coming months (Attached: white paper Executive Summary) The NRLN will use the white paper to advocate that the affected 14,000 TVA retirees should be entitled to restitution for the opportunity loss of the difference between premiums paid and those lower payments that could have been paid if not for the violations that occurred in 2017 and subsequent years.

The white paper also includes documentation that AT&T, Avaya and IBM retirees were not provided GIR notifications in violation of federal law and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) guidelines. 

The following information is a narrative of the results of a survey of NRLN TVA Retirees Chapter members to gain their input related to their experiences with OneExchange (now Via Benefits) to acquire Medigap coverage after TVA terminated its healthcare plan for retirees in 2016.

The NRLN has shared the survey narrative with members of Congress and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in Washington, D.C. in an effort to gain a Special Enrollment Period for retirees who where given inaccurate and misleading information on the availability and cost of Medigap plans.

If you are a TVA retiree who purchased your Medigap plan from OneExchange and would like to add your input to the survey, send your name and email address to nrlnmessage@msn.com. If enough are interested, we will reopen the survey and send you the link to the survey.

The report is a narrative of the results of a survey of NRLN TVA Retirees Chapter Members.

You may have read the June 9 NRLN President Bill Kadereit Forum message that announce the completion a new NRLN whitepaper on Medicare Advantage (MA). To access the whitepaper, click on the Legislative Agenda tab on the NRLN home page, select whitepapers and scroll down to MEDICARE ADVANTAGE QUALITY BONUS PLAN IS A HOUSE OF CARDS.

The NRLN’s primary concern has always been for its members and all seniors who see the TV commercials about MA plans and good deals that are “FREE.” Implying that Medicare Part A & B premiums and benefits are free is misleading since whether you stay with original Medicare Part A & B or buy a private MA plan to get A & B benefits we get all Part A benefits as we have prepaid the 1.45% premium tax on wages over our lifetime and we all must pay the Medicare Part B premium of $145.60 a month. Nothing free here!

Regrettably, our income tax dollars subsidize private MA insurance companies with bonuses and rebates that fund reduced deductibles, copays, costs in excess of out-of-pocket maximums and may pay for drug, dental and vision plans and for Silver Sneakers memberships. These rebates amount to $126 a month for every MA plan enrollee. In 2020, cost sharing and chronic benefit costs will be $35 billion and MA plan cost per enrollee will be higher than in original Medicare!

The 44 million in original Medicare and all others paying income taxes also pay for MA plan new “chronic” benefits for the 26 million MA enrollees that are denied to the other 44 million original Medicare beneficiaries. The NRLN is advocating this is unfair, discriminatory. All Medicare enrollees should be eligible for approved original Medicare plan benefits.

The NRLN fully supports competition from private healthcare plans and understands the financial challenges ahead for Medicare and the federal budget. However, the NRLN lobbies against legislated subsidies and restrictions placed on original Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) just to preserve the notion that private insurance plans are more effective. Sooner or later these subsidies will dry up, causing insurers to abandon MA plans. The NRLN’s proposal includes “grandfathering” protection for those in MA HMO plans should this happen.

When talking with Bill, I told him about the research I had been doing into the way premiums are often increased for Medigap, which are original Medicare supplement plans intended to pay the 20 percent that Medicare does not pay for Medicare Part A and Part B. My concern is that a Medigap policy begins with a stated premium but the premium can be raised at any time. This often happens with months after the Medigap policy is issued. I know a number of TVA members have experienced this.

I want to let you know that Bill requested that I continue my research and develop a proposal for the NRLN Board’s consideration to take a position on this issue.

If you have a Medigap plan and experienced premium increases within a few months of acquiring your plan, I would like to hear from you. Let me know the provider of your Medigap plan, when you began paying the premium and how soon the premium was increased.

Dan Pitts, President
NRLN TVA Retirees Chapter
Email: danpitts99@gmail.com

National Retiree Legislative Network
Based in Washington, D.C., the National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN) is the only nationwide organization solely dedicated to representing the interests of retirees and future retirees. Formed in 2002, the NRLN’s endeavors to secure federal legislation to protect retirees’ employer-sponsored pensions and benefits in addition to keeping Social Security and Medicare strong.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More...

Verified by MonsterInsights